Practical, substantive articles on forensic investigation, expert witness practice, construction management and the state-specific law that shapes both, written by PCC's own team.
A construction expert's opinion holds up when the investigation behind it does: inspecting before the evidence is gone, testing to recognized standards, a real sampling plan, alternative causes ruled out and every conclusion tied to observations and data.
Read the article →
What actually sets the cost of a construction expert, explained from the expert's side: inspection days, testing, destructive openings, access, subconsultants, reports and rebuttal, plus the controls that keep the budget where it belongs.
Read the article →
What PCC recommends for a consulting engagement versus a testifying engagement: scope, site notes and photos, drafts, communications and the report, plus what the client should decide before the first site visit.
Read the article →
A construction expert's conflicts sit in project history, not in a law firm's conflicts database. Here is what PCC checks, what we need from you and why no case facts should be sent until the check is cleared.
Read the article →
Five checks from the builder's and investigator's side for reading any forensic construction report. Not whether the conclusion is right, but whether the report shows its work well enough for a reader to tell.
Read the article →All submissions are held in strict confidence and reviewed within one business day.
